Technology resumes that separate the stack from the impact, so an engineering manager and a non-technical screener can both read the same document and reach the same conclusion.
The first reader is often a recruiter or a screening system checking whether the required technologies appear. The second is an engineer or a manager deciding whether you built anything difficult. A document written only for the first is filtered out by the second, and the reverse is even more common.
We structure technology resumes so both readers are served: a scannable technical profile near the top, and role entries where each line describes a problem, what you did and what changed as a result.
A compact, honest inventory of what you work with, with proficiency signalled by placement rather than by star ratings.
Each position turned into problem, action and outcome, with the architecture and scale a technical reader wants.
Side projects, contributions and portfolio work described so they add weight instead of noise.
Structure checked against how parsers read technical documents, including the parts that quietly break them.
Wording adjusted to the seniority you are targeting, which is often not the seniority your last title suggests.
Optional LinkedIn text built from the same material so the two never contradict each other.
A conversation about architecture, constraints and trade-offs, not a checklist of technologies you have touched.
We confirm which roles and which seniority the document is aiming at before writing.
The draft is checked by someone who understands the domain, so nothing reads as plausible nonsense.
Corrections on facts, terminology and emphasis until it is accurate.
Final files plus notes on tailoring for product companies, consultancies and agencies, which read resumes differently.
Seniority, target market, document volume and turnaround all change the amount of work involved, so a published flat fee would overcharge some people and underserve others. Send us your current documents and the roles you are aiming at, and you will receive a written scope and an individual price.
If your question is not answered here, write to us and a member of the writing team will reply in person.
Technical projects are handled by writers with a background in the field and reviewed before delivery. Where a domain is genuinely outside our experience we say so.
No. An exhaustive list dilutes the ones that matter and invites questions about things you touched once. We keep what supports your target roles.
We describe scale, problem type and outcome without naming clients or systems where you are not free to. That is usually enough to be convincing.
Yes. Engineering, data, infrastructure, security, QA, product and delivery are all within scope.
A resume rebuilt from your real achievements and structured so that a recruiter finds the relevant evidence in the first fifteen s...
Learn More
Headline, about section, experience and skills rewritten so your profile appears in the searches recruiters actually run, and read...
Learn More
Letters that explain the move you are making, answer relocation questions before they are asked, and connect your background to th...
Learn More
Tell us the roles you are targeting and the market you are applying in. We come back with a written plan and an individual quote prepared for your situation.
